Table of Contents
T-713-MERS-2024 Readings & Study Material
Readings README (Do not skip!)
INTELLIGENCE: THE PHENOMENON [5,6]
What is intelligence?
How do experts talk about it?
What has been uncovered?
What uniquely separates the phenomenon of intelligence from other similar phenomena in the world?
- The g factor on Wikipedia
- Theory of multiple intelligences on Wikipedia
- A Collection of Definitions of Intelligence by Legg & Hutter
- On Defining Artificial Intelligence by P. Wang
- A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition by D. Chalmers
- Computing Machinery and Intelligence by A. M. Turing
- What is Thought? by E. Morsella
- Thought on Wikipedia.
WORLDS & AGENTS [4,5]
All intelligence exists in a world.
What kind of world is the natural world?
- No, The Universe Isn't Made of Pure Mathematics by E. Siegel
- Never Tell a Scientist It's "Just A Theory" by E. Siegel
- Intelligent Agents on Wikipedia
- Crows Are Even Smarter Than We Thought by K. Hughes-Castleberry
EMPIRICAL SCIENCE [4,5]
Data comes from measurements.
Information comes from data.
Knowledge comes from information.
- Empirical Evidence on Wikipedia
- What Are Comparative Experiments? by D. Verial
- Causation & causality on Wikipedia
- Causality on The Information Philosopher
- Empirical Evidence on Wikipedia
CAUSATION
Getting anything done efficiently and effectively requires knowledge of cause-effect relations.
- Adequate Determinism on the Information Philosopher.
REASONING: THE PHENOMENON
Reasoning enables systematic (logical) manipulation of information.
Reasoning is efficient large amounts of information.
- Reasoning on Wikipedia
- Cognitive logic versus mathematical logic by P. Wang
- Toward a logic of everyday reasoning by P. Wang
- The limitation of Bayesiansm by P. Wang.
NON-AXIOMATIC REASONING [5,5]
- Solving a problem with or without a program by P. Wang
- Abduction in non-axiomatic logic by P. Wang
- A Model of Unified Perception and Cognition by P. Wang et al.
- Empirical case for two systems of reasoning by S. Sloman
- AGI NARS Tutorial by P. Wang & P. Hammer
- The logic of categorization by P. Wang
'COMMON SENSE REASONING' [1,4]
- About Understanding by K.R.Thórisson
- Understanding & Common Sense by K.R. Thórisson
- Do Machines Understand? by K.R. Thórisson
- Question Answering on Truthful Q&A on Papersiwthcode.com
- Common Sense Reasoning on Paperswithcode.com
NON-AXIOMATIC REASONING SYSTEM (NARS)
- NARS in a Nutshell by Tangrui (Tory) Li
- Non-axiomatic truth-values by Tangrui (Tory) Li
- Attention by Tangrui (Tory) Li
- Course Material for NAL-1 (v.1.1) by Tangrui (Tory) Li
LEARNING & KNOWLEDGE
- Growing Recursive Self-Improvers by B. Steunebrink et al.
- Cumulative Learning by K. R. Thórisson et al.
SUPPORTING TOPICS
Artificial Neural Networks
- ChatGPT Can't Reason by K. Arkoudas
- Limits of Transformers on Compositionality by Dziri et al.
- Self-Consuming Generative Models Go MAD by S. Alemohammad et al.
Limitations of Contemporary AI
- readings by
Probability
Readings README
How to Use This Page
Note: DO NOT SKIP READING THE BELOW TEXT
Papers under each section are ordered from most to least important, so start counting from the top.
[ x,y ]
x: necessary mandatory number of papers to be read – absolute minimum number.
y: the recommended number.
No number: Read all the papers listed.
It is your responsibility to ensure that you grasp the concepts covered in this class; the readings are my top choices (suggestions) for getting this done. However, if you are aware of alternative sources of treatment of the concepts covered in these you may prefer to read about them from your preferred source. If in doubt, ask me.
Assigned readings should be read before class.
If you do so you will already have some familiarity with the subject matter, which not only means you will remember it better but also that you can ask questions for clarification during the lecture and partially steer its direction.
Reading the papers after class is less effective.
You are expected to read all of the papers assigned in this course, at least 2-3 papers per week (4 recommended). Keep at it and you'll be fine!
Warning: Do not attempt to read papers during the group sessions as this is the absolute worst way to cover this material if you truly are interested in learning (you may of course have it open for reference).
Reading the assigned readings not at all should generally be avoided.
As you read papers from each of the following categories I want you ask yourself a few questions:
- For each paper in each category X, ask yourself:
- What is X?
- How does the human mind do X?
- Do current computers do X?
- …and …
- Do we need (to replicate or capture) what the human mind does to achieve X to create a machine that rivals the ability of humans to do X?
If you can answer them satisfactorily when you're done reading you're good! Even if you can't you'll be fine if you: Write down the discrepancies and bring them to class in the form of questions. There is no such thing as a 'stupid question' when you're learning something new.
EOF