This is a chance to do someone a great favor and get one in return, as well as to learn what it's like to do peer review.
Read the below instructions carefully!
In this exercise you will review your fellow student's full paper. (See peer review assignments at the bottom of this page.)
As an author: Send your assigned fellow student the most recent version of your paper at least 5 days before the assignment deadline.
As reviewer: Read the below peer review guidelines carefully. Do your best to provide the author with useful, truthful, and appropriately detailed feedback on any and all aspects of the paper that you feel requires his/her attention for improving it. In typical peer reviews you give the editor a recommendation, which is either accept as is, accept with minor modifications, accept with major modifications, or reject. Here, instead, you will give the paper a grade (list this along with your hand-in in Canvas marked 'Grade: x,x'). Make sure this number makes sense in light of / matches your written comments. Make sure you submit a copy of the actual paper you reviewed with your submission.
If you do a good job you will get 3 points for this exercise.
|Reviewer||Author of Full Paper v1.0 to be Reviewed|
|Antton Lamarca||Arnar Bjarni Arnarson|
|Unnar Freyr Erlendsson||Tomás Michalík|
|Arnar Bjarni Arnarson||Brynjar Sigurðsson|
|Tomás Michalík||Theódór Ágúst Magnússon|
|Brynjar Sigurðsson||Elías Ingi Elíasson|
|Theódór Ágúst Magnússon||Pétur Kristófer Oddsson|
|Elías Ingi Elíasson||Giulio Mori|
|Pétur Kristófer Oddsson||Michelangelo Diamanti|
|Giulio Mori||Pétur Kristófer Oddsson|
|Michelangelo Diamanti||Matteo Altobelli|
|Guðmundur Páll Kjartansson||Guðný Lára Guðmundsdóttir|
|Matteo Altobelli||Julia Elisabeth Haidn|
|Guðný Lára Guðmundsdóttir||Julia Elisabeth Haidn|
|Julia Elisabeth Haidn||Jaroslav Fedorcák|
|Hákon Freyr Gunnarsson||Antton Lamarca|
|Jaroslav Fedorcák||Unnar Freyr Erlendsson|