User Tools

Site Tools


rem4:philosophy_of_science_iii

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
rem4:philosophy_of_science_iii [2008/11/26 14:34] thorissonrem4:philosophy_of_science_iii [2024/04/29 13:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 22: Line 22:
 \\ \\
  
-====Rudolf Carnap: Observables and Non-Observables====+====Theory and Empiricism====
  
 | "Observable"      | Philosopher: what you can observe with your senses. Scientist: what you can measure   | | "Observable"      | Philosopher: what you can observe with your senses. Scientist: what you can measure   |
Line 28: Line 28:
 | Empirical laws    | Rule that relate two or more observables. Example: Color wheel artithmetic - yellow+blue=green.   | | Empirical laws    | Rule that relate two or more observables. Example: Color wheel artithmetic - yellow+blue=green.   |
 | Theoretical laws  | Rules that deal with non-observables.  | | Theoretical laws  | Rules that deal with non-observables.  |
-Relationship between rule and law  | Law: Rule that has become established (through experiment). +Rule <-->  law  | Law: Rule that has become established (through experiment). 
-| Empirical laws and facts  | Empirical laws relate facts about observables. +| Empirical laws <--> facts  | Empirical laws relate facts about observables. 
-| Empirical law <--> theoretical law  | Similar to relbetw. empirical and facts.  |+| Empirical law <--> Theoretical law  | Similar to empirical <--> facts relation | 
 +| Theoretical example  | The concept of "atom" would never arise out of observation | 
 +| Empirical example  | The concept of the "heat expands metal" can be measured on observables. 
 +| Theoretical laws produce empirical laws  | E.g. Theory of Relativity predicts bent light in gravitational fields. 
 +| Correspondence rules  | Relate theoretical laws with empirical laws and observables.  |
  
 +\\
 +\\
 +\\
 +\\
 +\\
 +\\
 +
 +====Will Science Ever Be Done?====
 +| The Big Question  | Will science ever be "finished"? Will it ever have explained reality to such an extent as we can say "we now have a complete theoretical framework where every theory has been unified (explainable in a single overall theory), everything is understood and everything can be predicted."   |
 +| Answer 1   | It will not finish because, at the current speed of scientific inquiry, the human race will perish before all things in the universe have been fitted into a complete model/Theory of All.  |
 +| Answer 2   | It is already "finished", in that its uncovering of big theories is slowing down, inevitably - for all practical purposes - grinding to a halt in the next 100 years.  |
 +| Answer 3   | We will build intelligent machines that can do science at 10k times the speed of humans. Hence we might be done with theoretizing the universe within humanities timeframe.  |
  
 \\ \\
/var/www/cadia.ru.is/wiki/data/attic/rem4/philosophy_of_science_iii.1227710053.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/29 13:33 (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki