rem4:abstract
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
rem4:abstract [2011/12/15 14:38] – oTdIuyuKwtSHkicObpt 81.192.38.11 | rem4:abstract [2024/04/29 13:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | xkoJWp , [url=http:// | + | ===== Abstracts ===== |
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Structure of Abstracts=== | ||
+ | | Outer context | A short introduction to the **field** or **context** of the research problem addressed. This places the research topic within the larger scientific context. | ||
+ | | Research problem | ||
+ | | Key Motivation | 1 line on why this work was worth doing. (Make sure the justification is scientific, not personal!) | | ||
+ | | Prior attempts at addressing it | If someone has addressed it, give 1 or 2 lines about this. | | ||
+ | | Why prior attempts are not enough | 1 or 2 sentences | | ||
+ | | Method | How did you do perform this work? 2 to 4 sentences. | | ||
+ | | Results | What were your results? 1 to 4 sentences. | | ||
+ | | (Conclusion) | (Sometimes authors choose to include 1 or 2 sentences to emphasize the **main message** or conclusion of the work described in this paper.) | | ||
+ | |||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===General Guidelines=== | ||
+ | | Keep it simple! | No one ever faulted a scientific paper for being too easy to read or having too simple wording or sentence structure. | | ||
+ | | Keep it concise | The abstract is the most polished part, wording wise, of scientific papers. | | ||
+ | | As simple as possible but not simpler | Make sure it's easy to read but says everything. | | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | ===More Info=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[http://www.editage.com/insights/ |
/var/www/cadia.ru.is/wiki/data/attic/rem4/abstract.1323959911.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/29 13:33 (external edit)