public:t-720-atai:atai-22:evaluation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:t-720-atai:atai-22:evaluation [2022/08/29 12:08] – created thorisson | public:t-720-atai:atai-22:evaluation [2024/04/29 13:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| | | Pros | Simple tests with a single measure provide unequivocal scores that can be compared. Relatively easy to implement and administer. | | | Pros | Simple tests with a single measure provide unequivocal scores that can be compared. Relatively easy to implement and administer. | ||
| | | Cons | A single dimension to measure intelligence on is too simplistic, subject to the same problems that IQ tests are subject to. All systems in the first 40 years of AI could only play a single board game (the General Game Playing Competition was intended to address this limitation). | | | Cons | A single dimension to measure intelligence on is too simplistic, subject to the same problems that IQ tests are subject to. All systems in the first 40 years of AI could only play a single board game (the General Game Playing Competition was intended to address this limitation). | ||
| - | | **AGI** | Turing Test, Piaget-McGyver Room, Lovelace Test, Toy-Box Problem | + | | **GMI** | Turing Test, Piaget-McGyver Room, Lovelace Test, Toy-Box Problem |
| | | Method | | | Method | ||
| | | Pros | Better than single-measure methods in many ways. | | | | Pros | Better than single-measure methods in many ways. | | ||
/var/www/cadia.ru.is/wiki/data/attic/public/t-720-atai/atai-22/evaluation.1661774934.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/29 13:32 (external edit)