User Tools

Site Tools


public:t-713-mers:mers-25:empirical_reasoning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
public:t-713-mers:mers-25:empirical_reasoning [2025/08/09 12:03] – created thorissonpublic:t-713-mers:mers-25:empirical_reasoning [2025/08/18 18:10] (current) – [Reasoning & Cognition] thorisson
Line 13: Line 13:
 |  What is Reasoning?  | A systematic way of thinking about and manipulating **models of relations**. \\ A systematic way to **create, compare, manipulate and apply** models of relations.  | |  What is Reasoning?  | A systematic way of thinking about and manipulating **models of relations**. \\ A systematic way to **create, compare, manipulate and apply** models of relations.  |
 |  How is it done?  | Via processes that observe **//rules//**.   | |  How is it done?  | Via processes that observe **//rules//**.   |
-|  What are the main types?  | Deduction: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Hence, Socrates is mortal \\ Abduction: How did this come about? (Sherlock Holmes)   \\ Induction: What is the general rule?  \\ Analogy: 'This' is like 'that' (in 'this' way).  |+|  What are the main types? **Deduction**: All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Hence, Socrates is mortal \\ **Abduction**: How did this come about? (Sherlock Holmes)   \\ **Induction**: What is the general rule?  \\ **Analogy**: 'This' is like 'that' (in 'this' way).  |
 |  \\ How is it used in science?  | In empirical science to unearth the "rules of the universe" \\ In mathematics as axioms. \\ In philosophy as a way to construct arguments. \\ In computer science to write code.  | |  \\ How is it used in science?  | In empirical science to unearth the "rules of the universe" \\ In mathematics as axioms. \\ In philosophy as a way to construct arguments. \\ In computer science to write code.  |
-|  Why does it work?  | Because the world's behavior appears to follow rules, in part.  |+|  Why does it work?  | Because the world's behavior appears to follow rules, at least in part.  |
 |  \\ Cause-Effect  | When the world seems to follow rules reliably, we call this //"cause-effect" relations//. \\ The more general cause-effect relations are described (in e.g. an abstract language), the more **//useful// they are for getting stuff done**.    | |  \\ Cause-Effect  | When the world seems to follow rules reliably, we call this //"cause-effect" relations//. \\ The more general cause-effect relations are described (in e.g. an abstract language), the more **//useful// they are for getting stuff done**.    |
  
Line 24: Line 24:
 |  \\ Deduction  | Figuring out the implications of facts (or predicting what may come). \\  Producing implications from premises. \\ The //premises// are given; the work involves everything else. \\ Conclusion is unavoidable given the premises (in a deterministic, axiomatic world).   | |  \\ Deduction  | Figuring out the implications of facts (or predicting what may come). \\  Producing implications from premises. \\ The //premises// are given; the work involves everything else. \\ Conclusion is unavoidable given the premises (in a deterministic, axiomatic world).   |
 |  \\ Abduction  | Figuring out how things came to be the way they are (or how particular outcomes could be made to come about, or how particular outcomes could be prevented). \\ The //outcome// is given; the work involves everything else.  \\ Sherlock Holmes is a genius abducer.   | |  \\ Abduction  | Figuring out how things came to be the way they are (or how particular outcomes could be made to come about, or how particular outcomes could be prevented). \\ The //outcome// is given; the work involves everything else.  \\ Sherlock Holmes is a genius abducer.   |
-|  \\ Induction  | Figuring out the general case. \\ Making general rules from a (small) set of examples, e.g. 'the sun has risen in the east every morning up until now, hence, the sun will also rise in the east tomorrow.'   | +|  \\ Induction  | Figuring out the general case. \\ Making general rules from a (small) set of examples, or from observation, e.g. 'the sun has risen in the east every morning up until now, hence, the sun will always rise in the east.'   | 
-|  \\ Analogy  | Figuring out how things are similar or different. \\ Making inferences about how something X may be (or is) through a comparison to something else Y, where X and Y share some observed properties.    |+|  \\ Analogy  | Figuring out how things are similar or different. \\ Using the properties of one thing X to characterize the properties of another, Y. \\ Making inferences about how something X might bethrough a comparison to something else Y, where X and Y share some observed properties.    |
  
 \\ \\
Line 32: Line 32:
 =====Reasoning & Cognition===== =====Reasoning & Cognition=====
 |  Working Memory \\ (WM)  | The part of the cognitive apparatus that holds the contents of what is being thought of at any moment. \\ The psychologist George Miller proposed that human WM can hold 7+/-2 "chunks"  \\ What are 'chunks'? That is a name for whatever that which can be **stored in WM** and takes up no more than **one** of its seven (plus-minus two) slots.      |  Working Memory \\ (WM)  | The part of the cognitive apparatus that holds the contents of what is being thought of at any moment. \\ The psychologist George Miller proposed that human WM can hold 7+/-2 "chunks"  \\ What are 'chunks'? That is a name for whatever that which can be **stored in WM** and takes up no more than **one** of its seven (plus-minus two) slots.     
-|  Ampliative Reasoning  | A name for using all reasoning processes discretionarily, as needed, together in the same system or for the same purpose.   |+|  Ampliative Reasoning  | A name for using all reasoning processes discretionarily, as needed, together in the same system or for a target purpose.   |
 |  Subliminal Cognition  | A name for cognitive processes that cannot be probed through introspection.   | |  Subliminal Cognition  | A name for cognitive processes that cannot be probed through introspection.   |
 |  Introspection  | A name for the cognitive activity of an individual that looks at the contents of its own mind (whether it involves contents at the present time or contents that it had in the past), for reporting to others or for **//thinking about thinking//**.   | |  Introspection  | A name for the cognitive activity of an individual that looks at the contents of its own mind (whether it involves contents at the present time or contents that it had in the past), for reporting to others or for **//thinking about thinking//**.   |
/var/www/cadia.ru.is/wiki/data/attic/public/t-713-mers/mers-25/empirical_reasoning.1754741013.txt.gz · Last modified: 2025/08/09 12:03 by thorisson

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki