User Tools

Site Tools


public:t-713-mers:mers-24:empiricism

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
public:t-713-mers:mers-24:empiricism [2024/11/04 10:54] – [Worlds: How it Hangs Together] thorissonpublic:t-713-mers:mers-24:empiricism [2024/11/18 13:47] (current) – [The Physical World] thorisson
Line 18: Line 18:
 |  A Question of (Un)certainty  | The physical world, and in fact many artificial ones also, are uncertain, meaning that there is a lot about them that we don't know.    | |  A Question of (Un)certainty  | The physical world, and in fact many artificial ones also, are uncertain, meaning that there is a lot about them that we don't know.    |
 |  Reliable Regularity  | To do anything //reliably// means depending on //reliable regularity// which is conducive to prediction.  | |  Reliable Regularity  | To do anything //reliably// means depending on //reliable regularity// which is conducive to prediction.  |
-|  AI Boils Down To  | Building machines that can figure out what can be reliably achieved in uncertain worlds.  |+|  AI Boils Down To  | Building machines that can figure out what can be reliably achieved in uncertain worlds, and act reliably on this knowledge.  |
 |  \\ \\ Abstract Worlds  | We may of course define any kind of "world" of our choosing. However, if it is to be **implemented** it must run using some physical properties, be it an abacus, transistors, light, or something else, and if uses physical properties these //must obey physical laws//, which means that \\ //1. an abstract AI that cannot be implemented is not intelligent (it is a blueprint for something else), and \\ 2. any AI must be able to address - using intelligence - physical properties//  | |  \\ \\ Abstract Worlds  | We may of course define any kind of "world" of our choosing. However, if it is to be **implemented** it must run using some physical properties, be it an abacus, transistors, light, or something else, and if uses physical properties these //must obey physical laws//, which means that \\ //1. an abstract AI that cannot be implemented is not intelligent (it is a blueprint for something else), and \\ 2. any AI must be able to address - using intelligence - physical properties//  |
  
Line 65: Line 65:
  
 |  {{public:t-720-atai:time-scales-newell-et-al.png?700}}  | |  {{public:t-720-atai:time-scales-newell-et-al.png?700}}  |
-|  From Card, Moran & Newell et al. //The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction// (1983) K. R. //Thórisson PhD Thesis//, MIT, 1996.  | +|  From Card, Moran & Newell et al. //The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction// (1983) via K. R. //Thórisson'PhD Thesis//, MIT, 1996.  | 
 \\ \\
  
/var/www/cadia.ru.is/wiki/data/attic/public/t-713-mers/mers-24/empiricism.1730717645.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/11/04 10:54 by thorisson

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki