User Tools

Site Tools


public:t-713-mers:mers-24:empirical_reasoning

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
public:t-713-mers:mers-24:empirical_reasoning [2024/08/23 10:58] – [Deduction] thorissonpublic:t-713-mers:mers-24:empirical_reasoning [2024/11/05 11:33] (current) – [Reasoning] thorisson
Line 9: Line 9:
 \\ \\
  
-====Reasoning====+=====Reasoning=====
  
 |  What is Reasoning?  | A systematic way of thinking about and manipulating **models of relations**. \\ A systematic way to **create, compare, manipulate and apply** models of relations.  | |  What is Reasoning?  | A systematic way of thinking about and manipulating **models of relations**. \\ A systematic way to **create, compare, manipulate and apply** models of relations.  |
Line 33: Line 33:
 |  Working Memory \\ (WM)  | The part of the cognitive apparatus that holds the contents of what is being thought of at any moment. \\ The psychologist George Miller proposed that human WM can hold 7+/-2 "chunks"  \\ What are 'chunks'? That is a name for whatever that which can be **stored in WM** and takes up no more than **one** of its seven (plus-minus two) slots.      |  Working Memory \\ (WM)  | The part of the cognitive apparatus that holds the contents of what is being thought of at any moment. \\ The psychologist George Miller proposed that human WM can hold 7+/-2 "chunks"  \\ What are 'chunks'? That is a name for whatever that which can be **stored in WM** and takes up no more than **one** of its seven (plus-minus two) slots.     
 |  Ampliative Reasoning  | A name for using all reasoning processes discretionarily, as needed, together in the same system or for the same purpose.   | |  Ampliative Reasoning  | A name for using all reasoning processes discretionarily, as needed, together in the same system or for the same purpose.   |
-|  Subliminal Processes  | A name for cognitive processes that cannot be probed through introspection.   | +|  Subliminal Cognition  | A name for cognitive processes that cannot be probed through introspection.   | 
-|  Introspection  | A name for the cognitive activity that processes the contents of a human mindat the present or from memory, for reporting to others or for thinking about thinking.   |+|  Introspection  | A name for the cognitive activity of an individual that looks at the contents of its own mind (whether it involves contents at the present time or contents that it had in the past), for reporting to others or for **//thinking about thinking//**.   |
  
 \\ \\
Line 41: Line 41:
 =====Deduction===== =====Deduction=====
 |  What is given  | A set of **premises** / starting point is given.   | |  What is given  | A set of **premises** / starting point is given.   |
-|  Mapping  | General -> Specific    |+|  Mapping **General -> Specific**     |
 |  What it's used for  | Figuring out the implications of facts (or predicting what may come). Producing implications from premises.    |  What it's used for  | Figuring out the implications of facts (or predicting what may come). Producing implications from premises.   
 |  Example  | "The last domino will fall when all the other dominos between the first and the last have fallen"  | |  Example  | "The last domino will fall when all the other dominos between the first and the last have fallen"  |
Line 50: Line 50:
 =====Abduction===== =====Abduction=====
 |  What is given  | A particular **outcome X** is given.  | |  What is given  | A particular **outcome X** is given.  |
-|  Mapping  | Outcome -> Precursors   +|  Mapping **Outcome -> Precursors**    
 |  What is done  | Figuring out how things came to be the way they are (or how particular outcomes could be made to come about, or how particular outcomes could be prevented).    |  What is done  | Figuring out how things came to be the way they are (or how particular outcomes could be made to come about, or how particular outcomes could be prevented).   
 |  Example  | Sherlock Holmes, who is a genius abducer.   | |  Example  | Sherlock Holmes, who is a genius abducer.   |
Line 59: Line 59:
 =====Induction===== =====Induction=====
 |  What is given  | A **small set of examples** is given.    |  What is given  | A **small set of examples** is given.   
-|  Mapping  | Specific -> General    | +|  Mapping **Specific -> General**     | 
 |  What is done  | Figuring out the general case. Making general rules from a (small) set of examples.  |  What is done  | Figuring out the general case. Making general rules from a (small) set of examples. 
 |  Example  | "The sun has risen in the East every morning up until now, hence, the sun will also rise in the East tomorrow"  | |  Example  | "The sun has risen in the East every morning up until now, hence, the sun will also rise in the East tomorrow"  |
Line 69: Line 69:
 =====Analogy===== =====Analogy=====
 |  What is given  | A set of **two (or more) things** is given.   | |  What is given  | A set of **two (or more) things** is given.   |
-|  Mapping  | Features -> Features.     |+|  Mapping **Features -> Features**    |
 |  What is done  | Figuring out how things are similar or different. Making inferences about how something X may be (or is) through a comparison to something else Y, where X and Y share some observed properties.   | |  What is done  | Figuring out how things are similar or different. Making inferences about how something X may be (or is) through a comparison to something else Y, where X and Y share some observed properties.   |
-|  Example  | "What does a pen have in common with an arrow?" "What is the difference between a rock and a ball?"  |+|  Example  | "What does a pen have in common with an arrow?" "What is similar / different between a rock and a ball?"  |
  
  
/var/www/cadia.ru.is/wiki/data/attic/public/t-713-mers/mers-24/empirical_reasoning.1724410681.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/08/23 10:58 by thorisson

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki