Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- public:t-709-aies-2025:aies-2025:moral_theories_i [2025/08/25 14:40] – [Problems] leonard
+++ public:t-709-aies-2025:aies-2025:moral_theories_i [2025/09/15 08:50] (current) – [Moral Objectivism] leonard
@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ===== Concepts =====
-| Morality | The system through which we determine right and wrong conduct \\ I.e., the guide to good or right conduct|
-| Ethics | The philosophical study of Morality |
+==== Morality ====
-| Theory | A structured set of statements used to explain a set of facts or concepts. |
-| Moral Theory | A theory that explains why a certain action is wrong or why to act in a certain way. It can be used to evaluate specific moral issues. |
+|  What is Morality?  | Morality refers to systems of principles or rules that guide human behavior, particularly in matters of right and wrong, fairness, justice, and harm. However, defining it precisely isn't easy because morality can mean different things in different contexts: cultural, legal, philosophical, and emotional. |
+|  Why is defining morality difficult?  | Different philosophical traditions and cultures offer competing definitions. Some focus on social norms, others on rational justification, others on universal truths. This creates tension between understanding what people believe is moral and what actually is moral. |
+|  Descriptive Morality  | A sociological or anthropological approach. It describes whatever rules, values, or practices are accepted by a group or society. This includes customs, taboos, and shared moral intuitions, even if they differ dramatically across cultures. |
+|  Normative Morality  | A philosophical approach: It is not just what people happen to believe (i.e., descriptive), but what they ought to believe. It refers to codes of conduct that are justified by reasoning, ethical theory, or principles regardless of social consensus. |
+==== Ethics ====
+|  What is Ethics?  | Ethics is the philosophical study of morality. It examines how we ought to act, what values we should hold, and how to justify our moral decisions. Ethics involves critical reasoning about moral claims. This includes not just what people believe, but whether those beliefs are justified. |
+|  What isn't Ethics?  | Ethics is not the same as: \\ \\ - feelings,\\ - religion,\\ - following the law,\\ - following culturally accepted norms,\\ - science. |
+|  Ethics vs. Morality  | While morality refers to shared norms, intuitions, or cultural beliefs, ethics is the process of analyzing, questioning, and reasoning about those norms. Ethics asks: Are these norms justified? What makes an action right or wrong? |
+==== Moral Theory ====
+|  What are Moral Theories?  | Moral theories aim to provide systematic answers to fundamental ethical questions: What makes actions right or wrong? What makes people good or bad? They help us evaluate actions, people, institutions, and principles using consistent criteria. |
+|  Purpose of Moral Theories  | Provides a framework for ethical reasoning. It helps us judge whether specific actions are morally acceptable, what obligations we have, and which values or principles should guide our decisions. |
+|  Role in Ethical Disagreement  | Moral theories help clarify the origins of disagreements. Often, people don’t just disagree about facts, they disagree about which moral principles matter most or how they should be balanced. |
+|  Why Moral Theories matter  | Without a theory, moral debate can become inconsistent or purely emotional. Moral theories offer a justificatory structure showing us how to move from intuition to reasoned judgment. |
 ===== Basic Principles =====
@@ Line 40: / Line 56: @@
   * Most influential variety of consequentialism.
-| Basis of Utilitariansim | Ask what has intrinsic value and assess the consequences of an action in terms of intrinsically valuable things |
+| Basis of Utilitarianism | Ask what has intrinsic value and assess the consequences of an action in terms of intrinsically valuable things |
 | Instrumental and Intrinsic Value | **Instrumental Value**: A thing has only instrumental value if it is only valuable for what it may get you (e.g., money). \\ **Intrinsic Value**: A thing has intrinsic value if you value it for itself (i.e., you would value it even if it brought you nothing else. |
-| What has intrinsic value? | For utilitarians: **Only happiness has intrinsic value!**
+| What has intrinsic value? | For utilitarians: **Only happiness has intrinsic value!** |
 The most ethical action is the one that produces the greatest overall happiness or well-being for the greatest number of people and minimizes pain or unhappiness for everyone affected by the choice. Outcomes are prioritized over intentions.
@@ Line 66: / Line 82: @@
 == The Categorical Imperative ==
+| First version | Act only according to that maxim [i.e., rule] whereby you can at the same time will that it become a universal law. |
+| Second version | Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end and never simply as a means.\\\\ -> Important to treat people as autonomous agents. |
+| Third version | (Not important here, just for completeness) Every rational being must so act as if [they] were through his maxim always a lawmaking member in the universal kingdom of ends. |
   * Influential in arguments for human rights.
   * Informed consent
   * Value the autonomy of individuals.
 ==== Problems ====