User Tools

Site Tools


public:rem4:rem4-16:reviewing_scientific_papers

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
public:rem4:rem4-16:reviewing_scientific_papers [2016/10/23 21:25] thorisson2public:rem4:rem4-16:reviewing_scientific_papers [2024/04/29 13:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 55: Line 55:
 |  Language quality      | Nothing is as annoying as a good paper that falls flat on bad use of English (which, let's face it, is the language of science, at least until China overpowers us with Mandarin). Be brutal! Do not be nice to badly written papers. NB: There is always room for improvement in this regard.    |  Language quality      | Nothing is as annoying as a good paper that falls flat on bad use of English (which, let's face it, is the language of science, at least until China overpowers us with Mandarin). Be brutal! Do not be nice to badly written papers. NB: There is always room for improvement in this regard.   
  
 +\\
 +\\
 +
 +SEE ALSO: http://cadia.ru.is/wiki/public:rem4:rem4-16:submitting_to_conferences_and_journals
 \\ \\
 \\ \\
/var/www/cadia.ru.is/wiki/data/attic/public/rem4/rem4-16/reviewing_scientific_papers.1477257911.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/29 13:32 (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki