public:rem4:rem4-16:abstract
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
public:rem4:rem4-16:abstract [2016/08/22 15:39] – thorisson2 | public:rem4:rem4-16:abstract [2024/04/29 13:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[public: | ||
+ | ---------- | ||
+ | |||
===== Abstracts ===== | ===== Abstracts ===== | ||
Line 8: | Line 11: | ||
| Outer context | | Outer context | ||
| Research problem / question | | Research problem / question | ||
- | | Key Motivation | + | | Key Motivation |
| Prior attempts at addressing it | How has this issue been addressed before? | | Prior attempts at addressing it | How has this issue been addressed before? | ||
| Why prior attempts are not enough | | Why prior attempts are not enough | ||
Line 22: | Line 25: | ||
===General Guidelines=== | ===General Guidelines=== | ||
- | | Keep it simple! | No one ever faulted a scientific paper for being too easy to read or having too simple wording or sentence structure, if all that matters is already in there. | + | | Keep it simple! |
- | | Keep it concise | The abstract is the most polished part, wording wise, of scientific papers. | | + | | Keep it concise |
- | | As simple as possible but not simpler | Make sure it's easy to read but says everything. | | + | | As simple as possible but not simpler |
\\ | \\ | ||
\\ | \\ |
/var/www/cadia.ru.is/wiki/data/attic/public/rem4/rem4-16/abstract.1471880351.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/29 13:32 (external edit)