Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| public:rem4:rem4-15:contribution_results [2015/09/15 12:19] – thorisson | public:rem4:rem4-15:contribution_results [2024/04/29 13:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 |
|---|
| | Contribution Section | Describe your idea - not how it has been evaluated. You may reference related work, but keep it to a minimum and specific (i.e. no "review of what so-and-so did" in the Contribution section!). \\ Give it a title that describes its contents. | | | Contribution Section | Describe your idea - not how it has been evaluated. You may reference related work, but keep it to a minimum and specific (i.e. no "review of what so-and-so did" in the Contribution section!). \\ Give it a title that describes its contents. | |
| | Method | Isolate the key ideas\\ - make sure you give them all the space they need. | | | Method | Isolate the key ideas\\ - make sure you give them all the space they need. | |
| | Trim off superfluous ideas. | - This can be painful: How can you trim off those little cool things that somehow you just know the world absolutely needs to know about? Trick: It is often a good idea to pretend you are going to write another paper, where you can put your shaved-off ideas. | | | Trim off superfluous ideas. | - This can be painful: How can you trim off those interesting little things that somehow you just //know// the world //absolutely// needs to hear about? Trick: Tell yourself you'll write another paper where your shaved-off ideas will go. | |
| | Do not cross-reference too much between sections | It is a common difficulty to keep the discussion on the topic of the contribution in the Contribution section, without referencing the evaluation results. This should be avoided at all cost. The best papers are the ones where the results of the evaluation are not given away before the Results section. And each section can be read mostly without having to jump back and forth all the time. | | | Do not cross-reference too much between sections | It is a common difficulty to keep the discussion on the topic of the contribution in the Contribution section, without referencing the evaluation results. This should be avoided at all cost. The best papers are the ones where the results of the evaluation are not given away before the Results section. And each section can be read mostly without having to jump back and forth all the time. | |
| | This is your stuff | Make it look **as good as it can look**! | | | This is your stuff | Make it look **as good as it can look**! | |
