DCS-T-709-AIES-2025 Main
Link to Lecture Notes
Revisiting from Session 3
| What it is | The ability of an agent to act and think independently. The ability to do tasks without interference or help from others or from outside itself. Implies that the machine “does it alone”. Refers to the mental (control-) independence of agents - the more independent they are (of their designers, of outside aid, etc.) the more autonomous they are. Systems without it could hardly be considered to have general intelligence. |
| Structural Autonomy | Refers to the process through which cognitive autonomy is achieved: Motivations, goals and behaviors as dynamically and continuously (re)constructed by the machine as a result of changes in its internal structure. |
| Constitutive Autonomy | The ability of an agent to maintain its own structure (substrate, control, knowledge) in light of perturbations. |
| “Complete” Autonomy? | Life and intelligence rely on other systems to some extent. The concept is usually applied in a relative way, for a particular limited set of dimension when systems are compared, as well as same system at two different times or in two different states. |
| Reliability | Reliability is a desired feature of any useful autonomous system. An autonomous machine with low reliability has severely compromised utility. Unreliability that can be predicted is better than unreliability that is unpredictable. |
| Predictability | Predictability is another desired feature of any useful autonomous system. An autonomous machine that is not predictable has severely compromised utility. |
| Explainability | Explainability is a third desired feature of any useful autonomous system. An autonomous machine whose actions cannot be explained cannot be reliably predicted. Without a reliable prediction, a machine cannot be trusted. |
AI pushes the boundaries of the definition of autonomous moral agents. However, assigning any form of responsibility or obligation to the entity itself is a perplexing and inconceivable endeavor.
| Core Idea | Every individual has moral rights that should be respected, including rights to truth, privacy, freedom, and fairness |
| Key Question | Does this action respect the moral rights of everyone involved? |
| Decision Making Focus | - Avoid violating anyone’s inherent rights - Don’t treat people as mere means to an end - Rooted in deontological ethics (esp. Kant) |
| Useful when | - There’s a risk of exploitation, coercion, or deception - You want to ensure informed consent and respect for autonomy |
| Core Idea | Ethical actions treat people equally or, if unequally, based on relevant differences (e.g., need, effort, responsibility). |
| Key Question | Is this action fair? Are benefits and burdens distributed justly? |
| Decision Making Focus | - Treat similar cases similarly - Use principles of fairness to evaluate outcomes - Consider institutional or structural inequalities |
| Useful when | - Decisions affect groups differently - There’s potential bias, favoritism, or systemic injustice |
| Core Idea | Choose the action that produces the greatest good for the greatest number — minimize harm, maximize benefit. |
| Key Question | What outcome will create the most overall good (or the least harm)? |
| Decision Making Focus | - Weigh consequences for all affected parties - Often used in public policy or cost-benefit analysis |
| Useful when | - You need to evaluate trade-offs or side effects - Ethical concerns involve resource allocation, risk, or public safety |
| Core Idea | Ethical decisions should promote values and conditions that benefit everyone in a community or society. |
| Key Question | Does this action strengthen the community and promote the common good? |
| Decision Making Focus | - Emphasize shared values like safety, education, environment - Supports civic responsibility and public trust |
| Useful when | - An issue affects public institutions, services, or infrastructure - You want to align actions with long-term collective well-being |
| Core Idea | Focus not on rules or outcomes, but on the moral character of the person making the decision. What would a virtuous person do? |
| Key Question | What would a person with good character do in this situation? |
| Decision Making Focus | - Cultivate virtues like honesty, compassion, courage, humility - Encourages moral maturity and self-reflection |
| Useful when | - There's moral ambiguity or conflicting duties - You want to reinforce ethical leadership or professionalism |
| Core Idea | Ethical decision-making should emphasize relationships, empathy, and care — especially for those who are vulnerable. |
| Key Question | How will this decision affect the people I am responsible for or connected to? |
| Decision Making Focus | - Prioritize context, emotional bonds, and responsibilities of care - Recognizes the moral value of dependency, trust, and sensitivity |
| Useful when | - You're dealing with unequal power dynamics - Ethics must account for real-world human needs and emotions |
You can use each lens
Detailed analysis can be found On the Santa Clara Markulla Center for Applied Ethics website